PELED: They like to call it war September 22, 2009
by Miko PeledÂ -Â mikopeled.wordpress.comÂ -Â 18 September 2009
48 hours after I landed the reality of this land, a land that people like to call holy, began taking its toll on me. The movie âBoy In Stripped Pajamasâ came to mind as I played with my kids in the pool of Kibbutz Zikkim. This beautiful pastoral little kibbutz or agricultural commune, is on the Mediterranean coast just a stoneâs throw from Gaza to the north.
Itâs only been about six months since my last visit here, just as Israel was preparing to launch its latest sadistic terror attack on the civilian population of Gaza, a population whose average age is 15.5, a population of innocent children. I visited Zikkim then because after all, it is the home of my in-laws, the place where my wife was born and raised.
In this chauvinistic state created by my forefathers the terror attack on Gaza is called a war. It is much easier that way for the consciences to bear. After all, fighting an enemy that possess tanks and war planes, artillery and sophisticated weapons, smart bombs and air to air missiles, along with anti aircraft and anti tank weapons is a great deal more heroic than to massacre innocent children, women and men who are defenseless, have no means of escape and no means of fighting back. But of course the reality is that the Israeli army, that sadistic military force that has made a name for itself over the last sixty years as a force to be reckoned with, is in fact no more than a shameless army of cowards lead by a junta of brutal, sadistic racists.
Instead of the patronizing call we constantly hear for a âPalestinian Gandhiâ one would hope to see the emergence of international support for a Palestinian Patrick Henry. The call âGive me liberty or give me deathâ awakens strong emotions even today, more than 320 yeas after Patrick Henry gave the speech that crystallized perhaps more than any the American colonies call for independence from the English crown.
There has never been, not is it likely that an occupying power will ever relinquish its domination willingly. Israel is not different. Not only is Israel not likely to end its iron rule over Palestine and its people, it is placing all of its effort to make Greater Israel a permanent and irreversible reality. So while Patrick Henryâs was a call for arms, in the case of the Palestinian struggle the call should be for a more sophisticated and more effective national struggle.
There is nothing Israel likes better than a military confrontation, and the Israeli âsecurityâ forces go out of their way to blame Palestinian for initiating violence so as to justify their own brutality. But a violent struggle only helps the oppressor and it is in fact a statement of despair.
Three clear goals struggle on which the struggle would do well to focus could be as follows:
1. Granting all Palestinians full equal rights with Israelis.
2. Granting Palestinians unrestricted freedom of movement within Israel/Palestine.
3. Reigning in the Israeli forces and withdrawing them of from population centers.
Until these conditions are met, Palestinians have no reason to negotiate or cooperate with the Israeli authorities. Until they are met there needs to be a concerted effort to isolate Israel, and to initiate a struggle that defies its laws and undermines it authority. Israel profits greatly from Palestinians who are forced to apply and pay for permits and licenses; Israel profits from Palestinians who are forced to buy Israeli products. Haaretz newspaper recently reported on the huge profits that Israeli farmers and government agents make as a result of the siege imposed on Gaza. An effort can focus on the idea, also made famous during the American Revolution that there can be âno taxation without representationâ calling for defiance of the Israeli authorities and boycott of Israeli products and goods.
Those who still believe in a negotiated settlement with Israel on the basis of two states should read the following lines from Patrick Henryâs famous speech: âIt is natural for men to indulge in the illusions of hope. We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truthâŚAre we disposed to be of the number of those who having eyes, see not, and having ears, hear notâŚâ
In the long run, the best possible outcome for Israelis and Palestinians is a pluralistic democracy where peopleâs rights are protected by a constitution and the rule of law. Israelis and Palestinians, by virtue of their sharing a homeland are fellow countrymen. As such they are deserving of the same rights and share the same responsibilities. Their first responsibility is to engage in a struggle to bring an end to the apartheid regime that holds them both in a seemingly endless struggle, and to cooperate as equals for a better future.
Jerusalem, August, 2009.
Miko Peled is a peace activist who dares to say in public what others still choose to deny. He has credibility, so when he debunks myths that Jews around the world hold with blind loyalty, people listen. Miko was born in Jerusalem in 1961 into a well known Zionist family. His grandfather, Dr. Â Avraham Katsnelson was a Zionist leader and signer on the Israeli Declaration of Independence. Â His father, Matti Peled was a young officer in the war of 1948 and a general in the war of 1967 when Israel conquered the West Bank, Gaza, Golan Heights and the Sinai.
Mikoâs unlikely opinions reflect his fatherâs legacy. General Peled was a war hero turned peacemaker. The general clearly stated that contrary to claims made later, the 1967 war was one of choice, and not because there was no existential threat to the state of Israel. He then dedicated his life to the achievement of Israeli Palestinian peace.